Designed by Dianne Krause
Introduction | Task
| Process | Evaluation
| Conclusion
Imagine that you have just graduated from high school and have decided to discover a province in Canada that you have never seen before. As a special graduation present, your parents are giving you and your best friend(s) an open return ticket to Montréal and spending money for a week. Since they are funding the trip, they want you to learn as much as possible and ask that you visit 3 cities and 2 attractions in each city. Now, you just need to decide how to spend your 7 days in Quebec...
First of all, you need to find one or two other people to travel with you. Then you should find a map of the province of Quebec and decide which three cities or towns you and your friends would like to visit in seven days.
One of your cities/towns, of course, will be Montréal since that is your arrival/departure point. You will need to choose two others. Plot your route on your map and plan your itinerary to include visiting two major attractions in each city, finding accommodation and transportation between the sites and cities/towns for the seven days.
You and your partner(s) will be evaluated together based on the scale below.
| Beginning | Developing | Accomplished | Exemplary | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Map of Quebec with route and 3 cities/towns identified
|
No map or wrong map provided | Map provided, but unclear, too small. 3 cities/towns and/or route not indicated. | Clear map provided that identifies the route and cities/towns to be visited. | Clear, color map provided with the route and cities/towns to be visited identified. | _____/5 |
|
Detailed Written Itinerary
|
No itinerary or an incomplete itinerary has been provided. | Plans are vague and itinerary is not realistic for the allotted time frame. | Plans are clear and realistic. The itinerary lacks some detail. | Plans are clearly laid out in detail and realistic in the time frame provided. The itinerary is authentic and purposeful. | _____/10 |
|
Written description of attractions and justification for visiting
|
No/little description of attractions provided. | Description of attractions incomplete and does not provide information requested. | Description of attractions provides the information requested. Purpose for visiting is not clear and/or weak. | Thoughtful and complete descriptions of attractions are provided. Purpose for visiting is clear and appropriate. | _____/10 |
|
Presentation
|
Student's voice is not audible and clear. Little organization is evident. | Student's voice is somewhat audible and clear. Some evidence of organizational skills. | Student's voice is audible and clear. Good organizational skills. | Student's voice is audible and clear. Excellent organization and flow. | _____/10 |
| Content of presentation | Presentation is poorly organized and displays little effort. No visual. | Presentation lacks creativity but is legible and displays some effort. Limited use of visuals. | Well-organized presentation that displays effort, some creativity, and justification of itinerary. Good use of at least 2 visuals. | Accurate information, fully completed, thoughtful reflection, with a rational justification of itinerary choices. Well organized and attractive. At least 2 color visuals are incorporated into presentation. | _____/10 |
| Completion of Packet | _____/5 | ||||
| Use of Class/Lab Time | _____/10 | ||||
| Total Score | _____/60 |
Due Date & Presentations: Monday, June 2nd
Now, you have designed a great trip that will allow you to explore another part of the country and experience the uniqueness of Quebec. Do you feel that you and your partner have earned the trip? Hopefully, you have been inspired to make the trip a reality one day.When you do, you'll know how to find the information you need and you'll go with a better understanding of what you can see and do in the "belle province" of Quebec. Who knows? Maybe you can present your hard work to your family so that they can begin saving for a graduation present...
Email Mme Krause
This page created by: Dianne P. Krause